What does Gene Roddenberry’s vision entail?


Much has been written about Gene Roddenberry and his vision since the release of J.J. Abrams’ ” Star Trek (2009)” film and the so-called NuTrek series, which air on the Paramount+ network. People from all over the internet have been using the term “Gene’s Vision” to demonstrate how one show is not a true “Star Trek.” ”

Roddenberry, the franchise’s creator, would have celebrated his 100th birthday this year. Along with the 55th anniversary of his show, Paramount and CBS decided to honor him with a live-streamed celebration.

$ ” The Man Trap ” was the title of the episode, and it made television history. To be clear, there appear to be several different definitions of what Roddenberry’s vision is supposed to be and how that applies to modern film and television.

Star Trek Day 2021

Some outlets, such as Screen Rant, claim that “Star Trek: Discovery” is embracing “ Roddenberry’s Vision ,” while Reddit users argue that Roddenberry’s vision was “wildly inconsistent” and “not good.” On YouTube, user ” Major Grin ” has posted a number of videos criticizing the creators of modern Trek shows. He frequently inquires if they “ betray Roddenberry’s vision.” Even Jonathan Frakes (Riker) stated that Roddenberry would be dissatisfied with some aspects of “Star Trek: Picard ,” particularly the episode ” Stardust City Rag . ”

Because much of what Roddenberry thought and said about the times he lived in was infused into “Star Trek” — as he explained to the “Hollywood Reporter” in 1966 — it makes sense to look at the early Trek shows to understand the underlying meaning behind his “vision.” ”

This is a difficult situation. In the most recent episode of ” The Inglorious Treksperts ,” hosts Mark A. Altman , Daren Dochterman , and Ashley Edward Miller argued about what made a story “Star Trek” worthy. ” It turns out that not even the people who worked for Roddenberry in the 1960s were completely certain. When talking about the TOS writers who returned to work on “The Next Generation,” Altman said, “Everyone thought they understood what a ‘Star Trek’ episode was — when in fact very few did.” ” “Even among the crew, which included Gene and Bob Lewin … and then you had David Gerrold , D.C. Fontana — they couldn’t agree on what was a ‘Star Trek’ episode.” ”

Five Things That Make a “Star Trek” Story

If Roddenberry, Fontana, and Lewin couldn’t remember what made a good Trek story, they should have gone back to Roddenberry’s series handbook that he created for ” Star Trek: Phase II Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Original Series Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Motion Picture Star Trek: The Motion Picture ”

This document was written to help writers and producers understand the parameters of creating a new series. It was a handbook for those Roddenberry intended to collaborate with, and it detailed much of what he thought should be included in the show. Roddenberry detailed five items in the handbook that must be followed to create a “Star Trek” story in

. These were: the stories were about people; they were set in an optimistic future; they were told from the perspective of the captain and crew; the regular cast were the heroes of each episode; and the Enterprise was the crew’s home base.

“This is “the crucial point” for writing science fiction, he said. Gene’s Vision: Diversity

As he wrote in the “Phase II” handbook, the Enterprise crew should be “completely multi-racial.” ” “We will see some traditional trappings, ornaments, and styles that suggest Asiatic, Arabic, Latin, and other cultures even in the twenty-first century.” ”

In this 1988 interview, Roddenberry stated that he could comment on “diversity” through “Star Trek.” ”

“In fact, the world has so many diverse elements,” he said in the interview. “Rather than wishing for everything to be the same, we should be grateful for the world’s diversity.” ”

Leonard Nimoy frequently stated that the optimism of Roddenberry’s creation set it apart from other science fiction franchises. “A lot of science fiction is nihilistic, dark, and dreadful about the future, and ‘Star Trek’ is the opposite,” Nimoy told the New York Times in 2009. “We need that kind of hope, that kind of assurance about the future. That, I believe, is what ‘Star Trek’ provides. I have to believe that I am a “glass half full” type of person.

In his own words, writer Andrew Hales summed up Roddenberry’s vision:

“Star Trek shows us that no matter how bad the world outside our windows gets, there is still a bright light at the end and that humanity has the potential to be so much more than it has ever been. ”

READ NEXT: The Side-Effects of ‘Star Trek’ History’s Skimpiest Costume

Clean Bowled News


Comments are closed.